Why similar wagers are regulated differently in the U.S.

Americans lost hundreds of billions across sports betting, crypto and short-term options; similar wagers fall under different regulators and consumer protections.

Americans are losing large sums across legal sports betting, crypto trading, prediction markets and short‑duration options, while those activities are governed by different rules depending on how they are routed. An analysis projects legal sports and casino losses will top $250 billion in 2026. Commercial gaming revenue reached $78.72 billion in 2025, with sports betting producing $16.96 billion in revenue on $166.94 billion wagered.

Activity that resembles wagering but sits outside traditional casino ledgers has grown rapidly. Prediction‑market platforms reported more than $44 billion in notional trading volume in 2025, with two platforms accounting for roughly $38 billion to $39 billion of that total; one platform reported about $21.5 billion and another about $17.1 billion between January and November 2025. U.S. listed options volume hit a record 15.2 billion contracts in 2025. Options that open and close within a single day tied to the S&P 500 averaged about 2.3 million contracts daily and made up roughly 59% of SPX volume, with retail traders responsible for about half to 60% of that flow.

Crypto speculation also expanded. Memecoins declined about 61% from early‑2025 highs to about $36.5 billion before recovering to roughly $47.3 billion by early 2026 after a series of celebrity‑ and politics‑themed token launches that produced large price swings.

Researchers and economists have documented social and financial harm linked to expanded betting access. One study found an NFL home‑team upset increased rates of intimate partner violence by ten percentage points more in states with legal sports betting than in states without legal betting. An analysis of credit‑report data by two economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that debt delinquency rates rose as states legalized sports gambling, with the effect concentrated among men and people under 40. Those impacts are not reflected in industry revenue figures.

Regulatory treatment varies by product type and platform. State gaming commissions license and tax sportsbooks and enforce responsible‑gambling rules. Some prediction markets operate under federal derivatives law and are overseen by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Stock options fall under securities and derivatives rules enforced by the Securities and Exchange Commission and the CFTC. Crypto tokens and crypto derivatives may be regulated as commodities or securities, or face limited oversight, depending on their form and the platform used.

Those distinctions have prompted litigation and enforcement activity. The CFTC has taken different positions in court filings, with a former agency chairman filing a brief arguing Congress did not intend the agency to act as a national sports‑betting regulator and the current agency suing states to assert jurisdiction over certain event contracts. States including Nevada, Massachusetts, Arizona and Tennessee have contested whether federal derivatives law preempts state gambling statutes. The trade group representing many casinos and sportsbooks has estimated that sports‑linked contracts on prediction markets diverted more than $500 million in potential state and tribal betting tax revenue since early 2025.

The commercial gambling industry has fragmented over the issue. Two major sportsbook operators left the trade group in November 2025. One operator launched a federally regulated event‑contract product that reached a $3.1 billion annualized trading run rate within six months.

Regulators and courts are reviewing where to draw lines between wagering and investing as retail access to speculative instruments grows, and legal challenges and enforcement actions are ongoing.

Articles by this author