Zhao praises Hyperliquid no‑KYC model, cites lawyers
Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao called Hyperliquid’s no‑KYC access “awesome,” said he assumed it had “good lawyers,” and said Binance would not copy that access model.
Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao praised Hyperliquid’s no‑KYC access model as “awesome” in a clip from a June 16 interview published June 18. He added he assumed the project had “good lawyers” and said Binance would not adopt the same access approach.
Zhao separated product design from operating risk, noting Hyperliquid’s user experience differs from regulated exchanges because it allows trading with fewer identity checks and less centralized compliance. He said Binance could match Hyperliquid on liquidity, listings and infrastructure, but not on the open access that defines the platform’s niche.
Regulatory scrutiny of Hyperliquid has increased. The UK Financial Conduct Authority posted a warning page on May 21, updated June 7, saying the firm may be providing or promoting financial services without permission and may be targeting people in the UK. The notice treats an on‑chain perpetuals venue as a potential financial‑services provider rather than only software.
U.S. regulators have previously pursued enforcement against platforms with decentralized or DAO links. In 2022, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission brought action against bZeroX and Ooki DAO, alleging illegal off‑exchange digital‑asset trading, registration failures and Bank Secrecy Act violations tied to leveraged retail trading.
At the same time, regulated exchanges are rolling out products designed to offer long‑duration or funding‑adjusted exposure similar to perpetuals while keeping custody, margining and KYC inside regulated frameworks. That narrowing of product differences leaves access policy and compliance posture as central points of contrast between on‑chain venues and regulated markets.
Legal reviewers point to public terms, onboarding flows, front‑end controls and geofencing as likely factors in how authorities classify a platform. Enforcement outcomes, further regulator statements or court rulings would clarify whether scrutiny targets the product, the users it reaches, the operator, or the absence of identity checks.
Hyperliquid continues to operate with a no‑KYC access model that some traders use for faster entry to leveraged markets. Regulators and market participants are watching how public terms and access controls will affect the platform’s legal status and competitive position.








