Cardano crosses committee renewal threshold by 0.18%

A Sept. 1 pre-boundary snapshot showed Cardano’s Constitutional Committee renewal with 69.36% DRep support and 51.18% SPO support, awaiting ratification at the epoch 653 boundary.

A synchronized Koios query around 09:59 UTC on Sept. 1 recorded Cardano’s Constitutional Committee renewal at 69.36% delegated representative (DRep) support and 51.18% stake pool operator (SPO) support. The SPO figure was 0.18 percentage points above the 51% threshold. The on-chain ledger remained in epoch 652 at the time, so formal ratification was scheduled to be assessed at the boundary into epoch 653, due about 21:44 UTC on Sept. 1.

If the update was ratified at the epoch 653 boundary, it was set to enact at the start of epoch 654 on Sept. 6. The snapshot showed the proposal’s on-chain record with no ratification, enactment or expiration at the time of the query.

Cardano’s governance divides voting authority among delegated representatives, stake pool operators and the Constitutional Committee. Changes to the committee’s membership are decided by DReps and SPOs; the committee does not vote on its own membership.

The protocol’s effective-vote calculation treats stake behind a pool that does not cast a ballot as a default No unless the pool casts an explicit abstain or is configured as alwaysAbstain. In that latter case, the stake is removed from the denominator used to calculate approval percentages.

A Koios breakdown separated roughly 2.008 million ADA in explicit SPO No votes from about 5.316 billion ADA counted on the No or default-No side of the calculation. The figures show that most of the negative voting weight in the SPO calculation came from non-participating stake rather than explicit No votes.

Four Constitutional Committee seats were scheduled to lapse at the start of epoch 654. Without an enacted renewal before those seats expired, the committee would fall to three active members, below the protocol minimum of five.

A committee below five members cannot supply the approvals required for certain actions, including treasury withdrawals, protocol parameter changes, hard fork initiations and adoption of a new constitution. The committee would still be able to consider no-confidence and update-committee actions, which do not require committee approval.

Late voting had pushed the renewal above both DRep and SPO thresholds in the pre-boundary snapshot. Final ratification depended on whether the threshold-crossing snapshot held through the epoch boundary; if it did not, the committee would remain undersized until a new membership update met the required approvals.

Articles by this author